The Effectiveness Of Scaffolding-Assisted Superitem Learning Models On Student Learning Outcomes
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aims of this research are to: (1) Describe the average learning outcomes of scaffolding-assisted superitem learning that are more than the KKM, (2) Describe the proportion of learning outcomes from learning using the scaffolding-assisted superitem model that are above the KKM of more than 70% (3) Describe The learning outcomes of the superitem learning model assisted by scaffolding are better than the conventional learning model. The population in this study were students in class VIII Odd Semester of SMP Negeri 3 Petarukan for the 2023/2024 academic year, consisting of 10 classes totaling 320 students. Samples were taken from this population using a simple random sampling probability sampling technique and one experimental class, one control class and one trial class were obtained. Data collection techniques use documentation and tests. Meanwhile, data analysis for this research uses the average test, one-party proportion test and one-party t test with a significance level of 5%. The results of this research show that: (1) the average learning outcomes of students using the superitem learning model assisted by scaffolding are more than the KKM with a KKM value of 70, (2) the learning outcomes of students using the superitem learning model assisted by scaffolding can achieve KKM exceeding 70% , (3) students' mathematics learning outcomes using the scaffolding-assisted superitem learning model are better than conventional learning models
Article Details
References
[2] Dimyati, P., & Mudjiono. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[3] Firmasari, S. (2018). Efektivitas Bahan Ajar Yang Dikembangkan Dengan Taksonomi Solo Superitem Untuk Proses Penalaran Matematis Siswa. AdMathEdu, 5(1), 55-62.
[4] Ghozali, I. (2018). Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
[5] Gunadi, F. (2017). Pengaruh Perpaduan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Dan Model Pembelajaran Superitem Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa. Wacana Didaktika, 8(3), 43-48.
[6] Hajar, Y., & Sari, V. T. A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMK Ditinjau dari Disposisi Matematis. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(2), 120-131.
[7] Hamalik, O. (2014). Psikologi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
[8] Haryati, H., Suryati, W., & Ceciria, D. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Superitem Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Kelas X SMK Trisakti Jaya Bandar Lampung Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Palapa: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah, 3(1), 1-11.
[9] Huda, M. (2014). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Isu-Isu Metodis dan Paradigma. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
[10] Ikawati, H. D., Majid, I. A., & Anwar, Z. (2018). Effectiveness of the Superitem Learning Model on Students Learning Achievements. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(3), 184-188.
[11] Jaya, A. K., Putra, F. G., & Mujib, M. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Superitem Berbantuan Scaffholding Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara, 6(1), 74-83.
[12] Kilic, H. (2018). Pre-service Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing Skills and Scaffolding Practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(2), 377-400.
[13] Laila, S. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Superitem Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam Kelas XI Di SMAN 1 Sragi Kabupaten Lampung Selatan. Skripsi, UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
[14] Susongko, Purwo. 2017. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Tegal: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Pancasakti Tegal.
[15] Sudjana.2005.Metode Statistika.Bandung : PT Tarsito Bandung.
[16] Sugiyono.2016.Metode Penelitian Pendidikan.Bandung:Alfabeta.
[17] Sugiyono.2012.Statistika untuk Penelitian.Bandung:Alfabeta.
[18] Maftuh, M. K., & Hidayat, D. (2018). The Effect of Superitem Learning Model on Increasing Students Learning Achievement. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(4), 367-373.
[19] Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2017). Scaffolding Norms of Argumentation-Based Inquiry in a Primary Mathematics Classroom. ZDM, 47(7), 1107-1120.
[20] Ngalimun. (2016). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
[21] Raya, A. K., Soleh, S. M., & Wulandari, H. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis : Dampak Model Pembelajaran Superitem Berbantuan Scaffholding. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 1(3), 363-371.
[22] Razzaq, A., & Nurnaifah, I. I. (2022). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Realistik. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 24-37.
[23] Rusman, A. (2015). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Gravindo Persada.
[24] Shoimin, A. (2014). 68 Model Pembelajaran INOVATIF dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
[25] Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
[26] Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[27] Susanto, K. (2013). Belajar & Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[28] Wahyuni, R., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Superitem Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Matematis Siswa Pada Materi PtLSV Kelas VII SMP Negeri 8 Singkawang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 4(2), 62-67.
[29] Wolf, M. K., Guzman-Orth, D., Lopez, A., Castellano, K., Himelfarb, I., & Tsutagawa, F. S. (2016). Integrating Scaffolding Strategies Into Technology-Enhanced Assessments of English Learners: Task Types and Measurement Models. Educational Assessment, 21(3), 157-175.